Lesson 3: Approaches to Indigenous Education
Lesson Overview
In this lesson, we discuss approaches to indigenous education that are helpful for all educators who may be teaching Native American topics or history, and that are relevant when using the Speak/Sing Native curriculum in your classes.
Approaches to Indigenous Education
1. Tribal History/Shared History (SB 13): A Model for All Students
- Mandated Inclusion. In 2017, Oregon enacted SB 13, directing the ODE to create and deliver a K–12 Native American curriculum informed by all nine federally recognized Tribes of Oregon, with place‐based specificity and accompanying professional development. Tribal History/Shared History
- “Shared History” for Every Student. The curriculum emphasizes: “How can we teach youth about Oregon history without including the voice of Oregon’s Native American peoples – both past and present?”–affirming that Indigenous history and presence is fundamental to the education of every Oregonian. Implementation of the Tribal History/Shared History Curriculum LESSONS LEARNED
2. Why Indigenous Education Benefits All Learners
- Equity & Achievement. SB 13 (Tribal History/Shared History) was passed to close persistent achievement gaps for Native students and to leverage Indigenous strengths in learning. TH/SH
- Cultural Literacy & Anti‐Racism.
Incorporating Indigenous narratives challenges stereotypes, supports empathy, and enriches collective understanding of whose histories matter. https://ctsi.nsn.us.com - Contemporary Relevance. Tribes of Oregon contribute current perspectives—from governance and resource management to language revitalization and art—underscoring that Indigenous peoples are neither historical footnotes nor monoliths. Tribal History/Shared History Essential Understandings
3. Best Practices from ODE & Indigenous Pedagogy
The following are best practices based on the ODE Educator Toolkit and pedagogical research:
- Learning from Indigenous Analyses. Shift from teaching about to learning from Indigenous perspectives and leadership Douglas County School. Implementation of the Tribal History/Shared History Curriculum LESSONS LEARNED
- Place‐Based, Community Collaboration. Build curriculum with Tribal partners to reflect local histories, languages, and cultures.
- Holistic and Land‐based Pedagogy. Incorporate land, language, ecological knowledge, and experiential learning rooted in Indigenous approaches.
- Critical Indigenous Pedagogy. Center decolonial perspectives that challenge colonial power dynamics and affirm sovereignty .
- Culturally Sustaining Methods. Build on student identity and cultural knowledge, fostering academic success and cultural pride.
- Ongoing Teacher Development. ODE provides trainings and support for educators to implement with fidelity and cultural responsibility.
4. Examples from Oregon Tribes
- Grand Ronde runs Chinuk Wawa immersion programs (K–1) and has a curriculum specialist guiding place‐based lessons under SB 13. Grande Ronde Wikipedia
- Confederated Tribes of Umatilla instruct tribal languages through immersion (Head Start to K-8) is reinforcing connection and sovereignty. Tribal History/Shared History Essential Understandings
- Tamástslikt Institute shares Cayuse-Umatilla-Walla Walla histories and contemporary cultural resurgence through exhibits and community events. Tamástslikt Institute Wikipedia
5. Teaching Indigenous Peoples Now, Not Just Then
- Contemporary Sovereignty & Governance. Lessons include modern treaties, environmental stewardship, political representation, land management, and economic development.
Tribal History/Shared History Essential Understandings - Revitalization Efforts. Tribal languages and cultural practices are actively being revitalized and integrated into schools and communities.
6. Theoretical Foundations from Academic Research
Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy
Definition and Purpose
Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy (CSP), first articulated by Django Paris (2012), extends beyond culturally relevant or responsive teaching. Its aim is to perpetuate and foster—that is, sustain—linguistic, literate, and cultural pluralism as part of the democratic mission of schooling. CSP seeks to counteract assimilationist, monocultural, and monolingual educational policies by actively supporting students in maintaining their cultural and linguistic identities over time. Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy: A Needed Change in Stance, Terminology
Core Principles. Paris identifies key components:
- Asset-Based Orientation. Recognizes students’ cultural and linguistic backgrounds as valuable assets, not deficiencies Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy: A Needed Change in Stance, Terminology
- Pluralism & Continuity. Aims to sustain diverse cultural practices and identities within education as a “democratic project”. Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy: A Needed Change in Stance, Terminology, and Practice
- Critical Resistance. CSP explicitly resists educational norms that seek to erase or marginalize non-dominant cultures through assimilation.
Relevance to Indigenous Education
In Indigenous contexts, CSP aligns closely with Culturally Sustaining and Revitalizing Pedagogies (CSRP), which emphasize:
- Reclaiming and revitalizing tribal languages, ceremonies, and knowledge systems.
- Addressing power imbalances rooted in colonial histories.
- Ensuring accountability to Indigenous communities and sovereignty. Indigenous Education Wikipedia.
Impact on All Learners
CSP benefits Indigenous students by affirming their identity and cultural heritage. Importantly, it also enriches non-Indigenous learners by:
- Promoting cultural literacy and respect for diversity.
- Enhancing critical thinking about cultural power dynamics.
- Preparing students to engage with a multicultural and multilingual world.
Implementation Strategies
- Collaborate with Tribal Elders and knowledge keepers to embed authentic languages, stories, and practices.
- Use multilingual resources and land-based experiences to anchor learning.
- Design curriculum that supports continuous cultural identity development across grade levels—not as isolated units, but as integral to learning.
Indigeneity-Grounded Analysis (IGA)
1. Origins & Theoretical Foundations
IGA was introduced by Fleras and Maaka (2010) as a policymaking lens aimed at “mainstreaming indigeneity”—ensuring policies integrate Indigenous principles such as sovereignty, relational accountability, and resistance to colonial logic. Indigeneity-Grounded Analysis (IGA) as Policy(-Making) Lens: New Zealand Models, Canadian Realities.
The core argument is that just as Gender-Based Analysis improves policy outcomes through a gender lens, Indigeneity-Grounded Analysis should serve as a framework to prevent systemic biases and elevate tribal voices in political and educational decision-making.
2. IGA in Action.
Oregon’s Tribal History/Shared History (SB 13): An embedded case study on Oregon’s Tribal History/Shared History (TH/SH) initiative highlights how IGA functions at the state level.
- The study explored how applying IGA—and its emphasis on tribal authority—helped build coalitions across school districts, educators, Tribal governments, and the state education office Arizona. An Embedded Case Study of Implementing Educational Curricula Policies: Building Coalitions for Oregon’s Tribal History/Shared History
- By embedding legal language and frameworks rooted in Indigenous sovereignty, the TH/SH initiative gained legitimacy among mainstream school systems, enabling structural transformation instead of token inclusion.
3. Key Components of IGA in Educational Settings
- Tribal Authority-Centeredness. Tribes direct content, protocols, and frameworks, ensuring accurate representation and respect for sovereignty.
- Coalition-Building. IGA fosters genuine partnerships between Tribes, schools, and
policymakers—grounded in trust and shared governance, not top-down mandates. - Legal and Relational Accountability. Policies are framed using Indigenous legal principles (like nation-to-nation relationships), so educational frameworks reflect real-world sovereignty.
- Decolonizing Mindset. IGA actively challenges colonial assumptions found in traditional curriculum structures, urging educators to rethink whose knowledge is considered valid.
4. Outcomes: Systems Shift Toward Equity
Following IGA practices, Oregon’s schools and districts show:
- Broader adoption of Indigenous curriculum across grade levels and subject matters—not limited to history units.
- Greater educator buy-in, due to tribal-led professional learning and clarity around protocols and moral responsibility.
- Movement from superficial inclusion of Indigenous content toward transformative change rooted in shared authority and structural alignment.
5. Broader Implications and Research Support
- In New Zealand and Canada, Fleras & Maaka’s foundational work emphasized that grounding policymaking in Indigeneity leads to more just and culturally aligned public systems. Indigenous strengths-based approaches to healthcare and health professions education – Recognising the value of Elders’ teachings
- The TH/SH case study in Oregon demonstrates that IGA is not just theoretical, but a
powerful catalyst for coalition and curriculum reform Arizona. An Embedded Case Study of Implementing Educational Curricula Policies: Building Coalitions for Oregon’s Tribal History/Shared History
Summary
Indigeneity-Grounded Analysis (IGA) is a transformative paradigm for education policy and curriculum design. By centering tribal authority, integrating Indigenous legal frameworks into education, and forming deep coalitions, IGA enables systemic change. Oregon’s experience with Tribal History/Shared History is a prime example—showing how IGA leads to structural transformation, reconciliation, and educational equity.
Reflection Questions
Consider the the following questions and write your answers in your notebook.
- Take a moment to review any concepts covered in this lesson that you may want to learn more about. Consider bookmarking research you may want to read later.
- How might some of these concepts and/or best practices inform your teaching of the Speak/Sing Native curriculum?
